Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Clay Minerals Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Clay Minerals; March 2004; v. 39; no. 1; p. 75-84; DOI: 10.1180/0009855043910121
© 2004 Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by APARICIO, P.
Right arrow Articles by BELLO, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Kaolin fractal dimension. Comparison with other properties

P. APARICIO1,*, J. L. PÉREZ-BERNAL2, E. GALÁN1 and M. A. BELLO2

1 Departamento de Cristalografía, Mineralogía y Química Agrícola, Universidad de Sevilla, Apdo. 553, 41071 Sevilla, 2 Departamento de Química Analítica, Universidad de Sevilla, Apdo. 553, 41071 Sevilla, Spain



View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Methods for determining (a) Hinckley Index (HI), (b) Stoch Index (IK), and (c) Aparicio-Galán-Ferrell Index (AGFI) by XRD.

 


View larger version (6K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. N2-adsorption isotherms.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Logarithmic area at P/Po (S(P/Po)) vs. logarithmic curvature radius plot for the studied samples (y axis arbitrarily scaled to avoid superpositions).

 


View larger version (105K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. SEM images of the kaolins studied.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Plot of factor loadings F2 vs. F1.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Principal components analysis. Projection of the cases on the factor-plane (1x2). Cases with sum of cosine square ≥0.00.

 





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland