Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Clay Minerals Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Clay Minerals; March 2008; v. 43; no. 1; p. 3-33; DOI: 10.1180/claymin.2008.043.1.02
© 2008 Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DYAR, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by BISHOP, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Mössbauer spectroscopy of phyllosilicates: effects of fitting models on recoil-free fractions and redox ratios

M. D. DYAR1,*, M. W. SCHAEFER2, E. C. SKLUTE1 and J. L. BISHOP3

1 Department of Astronomy, Mount Holyoke College, 50 College Street, South Hadley, MA 01075, USA, 2 Department of Geology and Geophysics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA, and 3 SETI Institute, 515 N. Whisman Road, Mountain View, CA 94043 USA

* E-mail: mdyar{at}mtholyoke.edu

(Received 16 April 2007; revised 20 November 2007)

Clay minerals are ubiquitous constituents in soils on Earth, are occasionally found in meteorites, and may also occur on planetary surfaces in the presence of water. However, little is known about the fundamental Mössbauer parameters (the intrinsic isomer shift, {delta}I, the characteristic Mössbauer temperature, {theta}M, and the recoil-free fraction, f) that are characteristic of clay minerals and critical to the correct interpretation of the Fe3+/{Sigma}Fe ratios as well as the mineral modes. Spectra of well characterized single mineral samples at multiple temperatures may be used for the determinations of f. Hence, measurements of five-layer silicates with a range of layer types are presented here: nontronite, Fe-smectite, glauconite, annite and biotite. The spectra were fitted using three different software packages: WMOSS from Science, Engineering & Education Co. in Minnesota; Recoil, from the University of Ottawa in Canada; and two programs used at the University of Ghent in Belgium. Four different approaches to modelling line shapes were used: (1) Lorentzian; (2) pseudo-Voigt (convolution of Lorentzian and Gaussian curves); (3) quadrupole-splitting distributions (QSD); and (4) a technique that does not assume a particular line shape (subsequently referred to as ‘model-independent’). Values of {delta}I, {theta}M and f were determined using the method of De Grave & Van Alboom (1991).

Results show that multiple doublets are routinely required by all models to represent Fe-site occupancy, even when all the Fe atoms of the same valence are in the same site, as is the case for dioctahedral smectite, nontronite, mica and glauconite. Consistent values of centre shift ({delta}) and quadrupole splitting ({Delta}) were obtained for the two distributions of M2Fe3+ in the smectites. In glauconite, a single Fe2+ doublet was clearly resolved and gave systematic values for {delta}, {Delta} and area, but the two Fe3+ doublets were less defined. In annite, two Fe2+ and two Fe3+ doublets were modelled, while three Fe2+ and one Fe3+ doublet were used for biotite. Three different programs that use Lorentzian line shapes gave very similar results for {delta}, {Delta} and area. The two different implementations of QSD line shapes gave similar but sometimes slightly different results, and the pseudo-Voigt and model-independent fits usually fell between the ranges for Lorentzian and QSD results.

The value of {delta}I is ~0.58 mm/s for Fe3+ and ~1.31 mm/s for Fe2+ across all models and line shapes, which is expected because the Fe3+ has an additional shielding 3d electron. Values for {theta}M data are nearly identical for Fe3+ in nontronite and Fe-smectite (~450 K), somewhat varied for Fe3+ in glauconite and biotite ({theta}M = ~730 K and ~615 K, respectively), and relatively distinct for Fe2+ (~350 K). Some values for {theta}M and f could not be determined due to the non-monotonic behaviour of the fitted values for {delta} as a function of temperature. Values of f295 were 0.821–0.917 for Fe3+ and 0.662–0.743 for Fe2+, consistent with previous studies of the recoil-free fraction in micas and other silicates. Calculated scatter in {delta}, {Delta}, area and f values as a function of different line shapes and computer software was significantly reduced at lower temperatures. Sources of error in each of the calculated parameters are discussed.

KEYWORDS: Mössbauer, biotite, annite, smectite, nontronite, glauconite, recoil-free fraction, quadrupole-splitting distributions




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clay MineralsHome page
J. L. BISHOP, M. D. LANE, M. D. DYAR, and A. J. BROWN
Reflectance and emission spectroscopy study of four groups of phyllosilicates: smectites, kaolinite-serpentines, chlorites and micas
Clay Minerals, March 1, 2008; 43(1): 35 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland